Digital Twin & Simulation
Simulate project scenarios to reduce investment and delivery risks.
We structure every phase of a factory relocation to ensure operations run without losing control
Factory relocations are driven by clear strategic logic – cost reduction, capacity expansion, better market access, or supply chain resilience – but the move itself is where that logic gets tested. More than a physical transition, a relocation is a moment where operations can either gain strategic clarity or lose control entirely, as activities overlap, risks multiply, and decisions made too late lead to disruption and costs that were never in
10-20%
Total relocation costs reduction
15-30%
Project lead time reduction
20-30%
Improvement in operational efficiency
Strategic Planning and Objective Setting
The Daily KAIZEN™ meeting can never fail and is extremely important for the group’s smooth operation. Above all, for good communication within the company.
The results are there, and we must focus and dedicate our time to continuous improvement, not to discussing things that are not measurable.
This continuous improvement system has delivered, once we reached a certain level of maturity, sustained improvements of several percentage points each year in productivity, year after year, consistently.
We significantly improved customer service level, given the reduction in errors we now have, and it far exceeded our expectations for efficiency gains in the organization. It was, without doubt, a very successful project.
Our partnership with Kaizen Institute was essential to our operational transformation, fostering a continuous improvement culture focused on the end customer. We were able to reinvent our processes, grow efficiency, and focus our teams on what truly adds value.
The hardest part is not explaining the model, it is conveying the experience of having lived it. The tools can be documented, but the mindset behind them cannot be learned from a manual.
The familiar pattern of capex projects arriving late and over budget, then ramping up below nameplate capacity for months. Root causes repeat across industries: weak front-end definition, optimistic baselines, fragmented contractor coordination, and startup treated as an afterthought. Each point of overrun is margin that operations must later recover.
Projects run with this discipline typically show materially better schedule adherence and reduced cost overruns, but the largest prize is often vertical startup: designing operability, standards, and team capability into the project so the asset reaches target performance in weeks rather than quarters. Time to full production is where business cases are won or lost.
By bringing flow thinking and lean construction practices to the project: rigorous front-end loading before commitments, collaborative pull planning with contractors using last planner system routines, visual capital project management of the critical chain, and daily coordination that resolves interface problems in hours. Variability is managed instead of buffered with padding that disappears anyway.
Yes. Recovery starts with an honest re-baseline of scope, schedule, and cost, then concentrates effort on the true critical path, installs pull planning and daily obstacle-removal routines with all parties, and re-plans startup in parallel. The earlier the intervention, the more options remain, but even late-stage projects usually hold significant recoverable time.